CONTACTS

 

 

 

   
 

Summary of the International Fisheries Trade Activities

Summary of the proceedings of Sea Urchin Summit

Sea Urchin Summit Recommendations Follow-up



download
Summary of the International Fisheries Trade Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BACK TO TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SUMMARY OF THE INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES TRADE ACTIVITIES

1. At the multilateral level, the Food and Agriculture Organization Committee for Fisheries is considering the development of a new binding international instrument on port state measures.  It was agreed to launch this process, but it is not an immediate help since it will be a two year process to develop and take up at the next COFI meeting in March 2009). In the meantime, the prospect of a binding instrument with both rights and duties for port states like Japan and its implications for Russian IUU can be noted in future bilaterals with both countries, but especially Japan.

2. At the regional level, there is an APEC project Canada is launching (with US and Mexico co-sponsoring) and it will include sea urchin as a case study on IUU fishing. It is planned to be completed within a year from now and it will provide a good profile of this particular issue and the report will make some recommendations that Russia and Japan can respond to. Lori Ridgeway, Director General, International Fisheries Policy, DFO emphasized the importance Canada attaches to this forthcoming case study at the annual APEC Fisheries Working Group meeting two weeks ago (the same group that will examine the case study when it is completed a year from now), and the Japanese and Russian officials who were there took careful note.

3. At the bilateral level, Gor Ruseski, raised this issue with Japan on the margins of a UN meeting in May particularly the catch documentation/certification scheme between Russia and Japan.  In response, the officials explained that the scheme has been in place for a few years now, but the documentation is showing up on the entire product being brought in (both legitimate and IUU) and so it wasn't working,  there has not been any review or assessment done to date. Mr. Hashimoto has reported that a greater official inspector presence from Russia has the potential to impact the illegal product importation.  Since the UN meeting, the Japanese government is preparing more specific information on the catch documentation/certification scheme.

There are plans to address the issue with the Russians at the North Atlantic Fisheries Ministers Conference coming up in late June. The meeting will be dedicated to discussion of progress on combating IUU in the region.   Russia is a member of NAFMC the DFO is preparing our delegation to talk to them on the margins about the IUU sea urchin, especially the enforcement aspect.  When a Russian enforcement presence is in the area (e.g., during the Putin visit to Japan in late February), fishing drops off, market demand increases and prices rise.

4. Next steps: (aside from bilateral opportunities as they come up at all levels) Prepare letters to Russia and Japan at the Fisheries Ministers level expressing Canada's concerns with the situation and hopefully suggesting some concrete areas where progress could be made, catch documentation/certification scheme improvements and/or examples of periods when enforcement presence (either Russian fisheries or Japanese inspectors) was up and IUU was down. There is also the option of a similar formal correspondence going through our respective embassies (my Foreign Affairs colleagues have been briefed on this issue as has the Ambassador for Fisheries Conservation Loyola Sullivan). With the letters, these would be more effective if the US was making similar interventions and there were concrete examples or suggestions to offer.

BACK TO TOP



 

download
Summary of the proceedings of Sea Urchin Summit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BACK TO TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BACK TO TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BACK TO TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BACK TO TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BACK TO TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BACK TO TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BACK TO TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BACK TO TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BACK TO TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BACK TO TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BACK TO TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BACK TO TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



SUMMARY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEA URCHIN SUMMIT

 

BACKGROUND
Stuart Nelson, Nelson Bros Fisheries Ltd.
Stuart Nelson, president of Nelson Bros Fisheries Ltd, is an independent seafood business consultant specializing in business planning for both private sector and First Nations clients, and providing objective reviews and analysis on fisheries matters for government agencies such as Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the Ministry of Environment (Oceans Branch).
The Sea Urchin Summit was held in Vancouver, B.C. on March 6, 2007. The Summit focused on the challenges and recommendations of the Benchmarked Competitiveness Study of British Columbia Sea Urchins which was commissioned by the British Columbia Seafood Alliance (BCSA) in co-operation with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) for the Seafood Value Chain Roundtable. The purposes of the benchmark study are: securing an enduring competitive advantage for Canada in international markets and gaining a better understanding of the red sea urchin fishery on the Pacific coast of Canada.The Summit was hosted and organized by the Pacific Urchin Harvesters Association (PUHA). There was particular emphasis on the impacts of the Russian illegal, unregulated and unreported (IUU) sea urchin fishery which was identified as the greatest threat to the economic sustainability of Canada’s Pacific sea urchin fisheries. There were 48 participants who included:

  • Regional and National AAFC representatives
  • Regional and National Department of Fisheries and Oceans representatives
  • Representatives from the Province of British Columbia
  • Directors of the PUHA
  • Directors of the BCSA
  • Directors of West Coast Green Urchin Harvesters Association (WCGUHA)
  • Alaska and California sea urchin fisheries representatives
  • Mr. Hashimoto processor and importer from Hokkaido, Japan

The red urchins are harvested for the gonads or Uni. Uni is a valuable delicacy sold primarily in Japan. The Red Sea Urchin fishery is a successful small scale fishery in BC. It is well managed, environmentally sustainable and generates wealth for participants and coastal communities.

THE RED SEA URCHIN FISHERY and THE PACIFIC URCHIN HARVESTERS ASSOCIATION
Mike Featherstone, Pacific Urchin Harvesters Association
Mike Featherstone is the President of the Pacific Urchin Harvesters Association for the past 16 years, a fisherman for over 28 years, owner/operator of a small value added fish processing facility and active on many industry committees and boards.

The Pacific Urchin Harvesters Association (PUHA) is a leader in co-management and research with a focus on sustainability, maximizing economic returns from the allowable harvest and cooperating with community groups. The urchin fishery had its first significant landings in the late 1970’s and the fishery grew slowly until the late 1980’s when effort and landings increased exponentially. The landings peaked in 1992 when DFO implemented coast wide TAC’s. During this period of rapid growth the typical “derby style” openings resulted in supply gluts, low prices and poor safety practices. In 1994, the PUHA facilitated a Voluntary Individual Quota system and in 1996 the Department of Fisheries and Oceans sanctioned a government Individual Quota Program. The implementation of the VIQ and the subsequent IQ program stabilized landings, improved fisheries management, increased prices and improved safety.
There are 3 Pillars of the Pacific Urchin Harvesters Association (PUHA). These are:
                 Sustainability
                 Maximizing Economic Value of the Catch
                 Increasing community awareness and knowledge of the industry.

The PUHA funds science and management from a budget of just over $600,000 annually. The budget is approved at the annual general meeting of the Association and a work plan is developed with the DFO. The annual Association fee is $5,500/licence which is paid to the PUHA for a validation log book which is required before commencing fishing. Due to the devastating market impacts of the Russian IUU fishery many fishermen cannot sell or market their product and therefore have not required a validation log book. This season only 70 licences out of 110 requested a validation log book and paid the $5,500 Association fee, leaving a $220,000 budget shortfall. The market limitations and subsequent decline in fishing activity have made it impossible for PUHA to fully fund all of the current science, management and operational commitments.
To learn more about the PUHA visit www.puha.org

 

Summary of Benchmark Study Findings
Geoff Krause, Explorations Unlimited Inc.
Geoff Krause is a consulting biologist and has worked with BC’s urchin associations for some years on a variety of projects. Last year he completed a study commissioned by the BC Seafood Alliance for the Seafood Value Chain Roundtable comparing BC’s urchin fisheries to other major producers around the world.

The Japanese urchin market has an annual consumption of about 6,000 MT of uni, Japan remains the main market for these products even as Japanese cuisine is the fastest growing food service category in many other parts of the world.

Canada in aggregate has the 4th largest legal urchin fishing industry in the world trailing Chile, Japan and the US. Japan and California are the primary markers used for comparison in this study. The Russian IUU fishery would jump Russia up to #3 if it were included. It is interesting to note that while Chilean fishery is by far and away the largest in terms of volume, Japan’s is the highest valued.

The landed prices obtained by each of these producers is generally categorised into 3 tiers: Japan at the highest level, the US and Canada in the middle and less developed countries including Chile, Russia and Mexico at a lower level. It is especially hard to beat Japan on the quality side because they may be more accurately characterized as cultivating their product, as opposed to simply harvesting it. 

The BC fishery is sustainable, our management regime is effective but it is more costly to industry in comparison to other producers because intensive regulatory measures, including on-grounds monitoring and comprehensive validation, and research are fully funded by industry. These activities are either not required or are partially funded by government in other countries.

Harvesting and transport operations are efficient in good part because of high daily harvest levels that allow certain economies of scale with harvesting, packing and transport.

The distances from the main fishing grounds allow the accumulation of more handling impacts and higher costs in comparison to Japan and California, considered the two premiere producers for the purposes of this study. The post-harvest transit times to the plants in their fisheries are measured in hours while product off BC’s North Coast can take days. This requires extra care to get the same results. The greater distances also mean we face higher costs, especially from the North Coast. Developing countries have advantages in some respects because the pay rates are lower.

The rise of a Russian Illegal, Unregulated and Unreported (IUU) fishery confounds matters. This fishery produces a product comparable to domestic Japanese sea urchin at prices legitimate producers simply cannot match because normal regulatory limits and costs simply do not apply.  It is identified in the study as the biggest problem facing legitimate suppliers simply because of the market impacts from the volumes and low prices involved. 200 - 600 tons a week (approx 10,000 tons annually) are landed at the Japanese port of Hanosaki where it is picked up by Japanese processors, flooding the system and depressing prices and causing severe disruptions throughout the whole Japanese urchin market. The impact of the Russian IUU urchin fishery on legitimate producers is a conspicuous example of how critical economic factors are to the sustainability equation.

IUU fisheries are a large and growing problem around the world and effective solutions require internationally recognized and applied principles, tools and regulatory policies which are coherent across all fisheries. In this case, the location and direct delivery ports of this IUU fishery and the limited number of interests involved may provide an opportunity to find and test workable solutions for wider application.

                                                                                   

Industry Panel on the Current State of Sea Urchin Industry in BC

The industry panel consisted of processors and fishermen who explained how the Russian IUU fishing had affected their current business

Kiku Fisheries, William Choi
William Choi, President, KiKu Fisheries received a BA Honours of Political Science from  University of Western Ontario and a MBA from Keio University Tokyo and Yonsei University Seoul. After graduating William worked 2 years at Price, Waterhouse and Cooper. Since that time he has been running the family sea urchin business with his father and mother.

For over 25 years, Kiku Fisheries Corporation has been a leading supplier of sea urchin products to the world.  The company focused almost entirely on sea urchin and has suffered the most drastic reductions. Over the past three years the company has been reduced from biggest BC urchin processor to one of smallest. As recently as 2002 the company employed over 125 employees for 8-10 months/year. This year the company has cut staff by over 70% and revenue is less than 20% of previous years. Even Revenue Canada has contacted the Company to enquire to the drastic drop in earnings.

Grand Hale Marine Products, Francis Chueng
Francis Chueng, Vice-President, Grand Hale Marine Products, attended Simon Fraser University in the 70’s and graduated with Bachelor of Psychology. He remained in Canada and established a restaurant business and eventually formed Grand Hale Marine with his family members in the late 80’s.

In 1989, Grand Hale Marine Products Company Limited was established in Vancouver, B.C., Canada. Starting as a 5,000 square foot processing plant, Grand Hale processed fresh Sea Urchin Roe for the Japanese market. The company has grown and diversified and now has a 50,000 square foot facility in Richmond and a 18,000 square foot facility in Port Edward. The company normally employees 150 people year round but revenues from the sea urchin have declined severely and there were forced layoffs during the sea urchin season from November to March this year.

Hi-To Fisheries
Tony Hieda, President, Hi-To Fisheries Ltd., one of the first companies to process sea urchins in BC, spent time in Hokkaido before starting his export business in BC. Specializes in products for the Japanese market for the past 29 years.

 Hi-To Fisheries has processed sea urchin for over 28 years and employees over 100 full time workers during the normal sea urchin season. This year the company only employeed 30 workers on a part time basis. The company sea urchins sales have declined drastically over the past 5 years and they are very concerned about future. There needs to be more value adding and new markets. They used to ship 50 tons of green sea urchins per year this year they shipped 1 ton.

 

Territory Seafoods
Mike Crawford, President Territory Seafoods, graduated in 1987 from BCIT with a degree in Operations Management, started the sea urchin business in 1991 and processing red sea urchin in 1992.

Employed over 75 employees in the past but this year only 20 employees. It is very difficult to survive the current situation. The biggest factor is Russia IUU. Drastic change needed as this industry is on life support.

West Coast Green Sea Urchin Association
Michael Callow, President of West Coast Green Sea Urchin Association. 

The green sea urchin fishery is in a total collapse with only 12% of the TAC harvested this year. It is questionable if there will be a fishery by next year. Problem is directly related to the Russian IUU fishery.

Red Sea Urchin fisherman
Bob Hegadus, Captain of Westport I, involved in the dive fisheries for over 15 years, married with 3 children living in a coastal community on the Sunshine Coast.

The current situation has had a dramatic effect on the fishermen. There are fewer divers, tenders and crewmen who want to work in the industry now. Costs are up and prices are down. No young divers recruiting to fishery. Safety is compromised (smaller crew sizes).

California Sea Urchin Commission  
Pete Halmay, sea urchin harvester, owner operator working out of San Diego, over 35 years experience in the business.

California can compete with legitimate players. BC and California should take joint approach… interests are shared.

 

Monitoring Programs
Don Christian, D&D Pacific Fisheries Ltd., former sea urchin fisherman who formed D&D Pacific Fisheries with partner Darren Macey in 1993. Provide validation and monitoring services to B.C. Fisheries with a focus on communication, sustainable management and research.

Don provided a history of fishery from the pre-IQ times to today and outlined the many elements and objectives (not just enforcement) and  roles of the Dockside Monitoring Program (DMP), funded 100% by industry. The current problems are urgent and significant. There are only 61 red urchin licences active currently (out of 110); and only 41% of RSU TAC has been caught this year to date, vs 85% at this time normally. The situation is worse with the Green urchins as less than 7% caught and the season virtually over. The DMP costs have risen per pound of harvest, while prices have dropped. D&D knows that industry cannot afford current cost burden and is looking at ways to re-structure costs.

 

 

Science and Management
Juanita Rogers DFO Management Biologist, over 10 years as the head management biologist for red sea urchins, attended sea urchin management conferences in Chile, California and Alaska. Traveled with industry representatives to Tokyo to provide Japanese sea urchin importers and marketers valuable information on the sea urchin fishery management.

Juanita provided an explanation of the “cycle” of fishery review, stock assessment, and fishery management. The relationship between DFO and urchin harvesters is key to its effectiveness. BC is a far-flung area, five regions are assessed; estimating biomass to set quotas. The fishery management toolkit comprises minimum size limits, limited entry, IQ, area licensing and area quotas with all the activities are funded by industry through a Joint Project Agreement.

We’re here for the long haul and need to explore alternative ways of gaining information needed to manage the fishery at lower cost. We also need to work urgently to assess where we’re going.

 

Current Update on the Japanese Market and Russian IUU Situation
Masao Hashimoto   President, Kokusai Boueki Company, introduced to PUHA representatives in 2004 by the Canadian Embassy in Sapparro. Very knowledgeable of the sea urchin business and has worked with Canadian, Russian and Japanese officials in an effort to provide understanding, advice and solutions to the current situation.

Hashimoto-san is based in Sapporo and has worked with Russians for 20 years, providing him with a unique and comprehensive understanding of the problems. IUU fisheries in this area are big problems, not just in urchins, but in other fisheries like salmon and crab. Basically the impacts relate to oversupply into Japanese market.

Over the last three years, imports of urchins to Japan from Russia have exploded. He is aware of discussions between Canadian, Japanese, and Russian governments and realizes it is an international problem with much of the responsibility on the Japan side. His ideas involve continued discussions with Russian and Japanese officials in an effort to reach a compromise situation to stabilize the market. The current situation is not good for Japanese processors and marketers.

 

Canada’s Federal Response to Russian IUU Situation
Gorazd Ruseski,  DFO International Trade and Integration Branch

IUU fisheries worldwide are problematic and represent an estimated value US$ 4-9 billion/yr.
There is opportunity to engage Russia and Japan on many “fronts.” There are several forums in next few months. Canada is pursuing both bi-lateral and multi-lateral discussions with Japan and Russia. Russia is working on its own internal plan of action whereas Japan does not appear to be. There is apparently a fairly strong case that Japan can, and should, validate landings at ports more stringently. Japanese harvesters now feeling impacts, which will help apply pressure and Japan has obligations under international agreements to which it is signatory. UN/FAO – port state scheme – may become binding. APEC Regions – sustainable development – Canada will put forward sea urchin case study.

 

“The Collapse of Order in the Russian Far East”
Terry Glavin  Author, Journalist, Adjunct UBC Professor, his recent book “Waiting for the MacCaws” includes a chapter on the current situation in the Russian Far East. Terry provided first hand knowledge of the situation from his personal experience.

Since the fall of communism, massive events in Russia have been largely ignored. In the far east “everyone’s a poacher” out of simple necessity. Russia now like the “wild west” with commerce dominated by small-scale (poachers) and organized crime. A huge percentage of the Russian economy is controlled by criminals and there is a distinct lack of control over harvest of natural resources which is threatening numerous species. Harvests are clearly not sustainable. This situation is persisting, and growing in spite of the best intentions of ordinary Russians
Opinion: something is going to “give” in Russia’s far east.

 

Brand Canada
Janice Vansickle Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

PUHA has signed on to Canada Branding initiative and there are benefits of a strong brand and the Canada Brand “promise”
          “We are committed to earning our customers’ trust in Canadian agriculture and food products every day through our relentless pursuit of excellence in all that we do”.    
A “template” was provided for how agri-food producers can exploit the Canada brand, generically, and at a company level using special crops as an example.

 

Urchin Summit Working Group Sessions
Charlie Minns, Facilitator, involved with the Seafood Business in British Columbia for over 25 years with an extensive background in the processing and training sector. Long time experience with the sea urchin fishery during the early development and growth.

Given the economic crisis described today, we must develop and implement strategies to effect positive change, both short term and long term. Participants organized into working groups to tackle four broad topics: Government policy – Russian IUU Fishery; Government policy – Fishery Management/Science; Operational Efficiencies; Marketing.

1. Operational Efficiencies

This is an area of direct industry control and the focus was on steps needed to improve the bottom line, for example: Quality, Yields, Costs, Transportation and/or Handling methods.

Quality and yield – areas, times; pay based on recovery and yields with a standardized grading system, educate fishermen (color charts, tray size)
Need to respond to markets quickly continued communication with fishermen, processors, DFO managers and Japanese importers, stagger production to avoid conflicts with Russian IUU – ocean to plate strategy
Replace On Grounds Monitor (OGM) w/ electronic monitoring as cost reduction
Proper handling, standardize containers (bag sizes that work well), standarized crates which can be utilized on all vessels
Transportation – improve logistics with full truckloads to lower costs;
Transport as it relates to quality; more awareness of Krause project, (logisitics study from grounds to processors)
Handle product only once; bag out of water, product direct to tote or crate (eliminate handling stages)
DMP… creates extra handling; validate at processor vs grounds

 

2. Marketing & Value Adding

Given the realities of the current Japanese market and recognizing current budget constraints, what can we do to improve the marketability and values for our product? Specific initiatives might include Market research, Product development and/or Customer service.

PUHA continue CAFI program, trade shows in Asia, particularly China to diversify markets, use website to educate US and domestic markets, for Japan – get feedback from end consumer
MSC cert. – it’s a growing movement, Japan retailers are gaining awareness.
Greater effort on local domestic market, food shows/media (perhaps with provincial funding support), specialized marketing at boat level, (fishermen to restaurant)
Consistent supply… we’re not there yet (participation, weather)
Diversify product uses have Vancouver chefs develop ideas (soups, quiches, etc).
roll out to USA; Value add; eg uni roll at local restaurants (frozen), better utilization of lower grades for a variety of products
Diversify packaging methods; improve shelf life – vacuum, MAP, canning
Process green sea urchin in Canada, pack more finished trays less bulk (less pack/re-pack thru to end user)
Nutraceutical/health benefits – “ocean viagra”, health aspects, functional food
Work with conservation groups to develop an awareness of IUU fisheries, implications for consumers

 

3. Government Policy: Fishery Management/Science

Given the spirit of co-management in the BC urchin fisheries, list short term cost relief strategies not compromising sustainability

OGM monitoring at plant vs. dock level – water loss
Mandating compulsory licence activation (PUHA reaches income)
Or… Subsidy of non-activated licences
Buyback of licences not being used (ATP inventory don’t generate revenue)
EVM:  East Coast vs. West Coast parity
Reduced DFO licence fees – current values based on 90-93 incomes… re-evaluate
Waive DFO licence fees if you pay the PUHA fee (incentive to participate)
Sliding scale of science/mgt costs that reflect level of landings
OGM – EC has EM run by DFO… WC no EM
Budget OGM for high priority areas only (QCI, 3,4…)
15% water loss reduction at dock… means recovery would go up… better for fishermen
Validation at plant vs dockside
Share salary cost of research staff amongst various fisheries, industry cannot afford programs it’s committed to
Re-structure quota system to reflect participation? Incentives to participate, or benefit to those that stay in.
Reds & greens – meeting w/ DFO to go over options (next couple of weeks, before season over)… what can be done?
Short term adjustments to science and D&D payments… things to get through this yr & next yr
Things have changed… make appropriate cost burden for level of fishery (we were about 7% of gross… now +20% (Alaska legislate 7%, Magnuson 3%)
We need bridge financing from DFO to get through this year (political approach)
Big picture of science & management… need appropriate G&O… workshop? Outside of regular routine. Step back. Include DFO & industry.
Science – density, biomass, population size info… is way we gain info appropriate? (in current economic environment) - better use of on-grounds knowledge (fishermen, real-time) or extrapolate info across coast..
Fisheries Management toolkit – EM, more info from fewer areas
Upshot – more meetings, don’t be frozen by inaction. Coalition of DFO and industry
Consider – real time fishery info that is available vs pure science. Commitment from government to use fishermen knowledge

 

4. Government Policy: Russian IUU Situation

List specific strategies to influence positive change in the Russian urchin fishery and the Japanese market

Work with Ottawa to apply pressure to Japan first, Russia second, follow up of international forums (get and distribute daily intel on Russian landings); Pursue anti-dumping; Follow up on port validation req’ts; coordinated approach – w/in govt, externally (AKA)
Pressure on Japan to follow port state protocol; provide solutions to Japan
Maintain dialogue w/ Russia… don’t back them into corner
Canadian embassy in Japan… talk to Japanese fishermen… how are they affected?
Discussions with Russian fishermen to get their views (working conditions, price)
Unified group, include California, Alaska; two-fronts – reduce supply of IUU by working w/ AK, CA, pressure govt; other fisheries are just starting to be effected (spot prawns, halibut, salmon, king crab) not just urchins; work with CA, Alaska, Japanese harvesters to raise the issue with their governments
Involvement of Japanese and Canadian environmental interests (activists)
International sea urchin summit, supply side management
Roundtable in Ottawa – present summit overview and recommendations

 

 

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Pacific Urchin Harvesters Association is a leader in co-management and research with a focus on sustainability, maximizing economic returns from the allowable harvest and cooperating with community groups.

The industry has been devastated by the Russian IUU fishery with only 50% of the total allowable catch harvested this season due to the market collapse. This has resulted in the loss of approximately 300 full time shore workers jobs, millions of dollars in lost export revenues and the industry cannot fully fund all of the current science, management and operational commitments.

 

In response to these challenges the following actions are recommended:

  • Meet immediately with DFO Pacific region management to discuss and institute interim measures to complete this season given the current financial constraints
  • Request interim funding to meet science and research commitments for 2007/08, request rebate of DFO licence fee for validated licences
  • Meet with DFO International Directorate and Economic Policy Representatives to discuss options with respect to Russian IUU fishery, then engage Alaska and California representatives
  • Work with regional science managers to develop alternative methods to gather necessary scientific information in a cost effective manner –special meeting to focus on this issue
  • Engage Japanese and Russian conservation groups to build knowledge and understanding of the current Russian IUU situation
  • Request provincial Government funding for MSC pre-assessment
  • Institute logistics recommendations from Krause report for 2008
  • Work with processors to develop a quality/recovery based pay system
  • Plan for trade mission to China next November with follow up to Japan

BACK TO TOP

 


download
Sea Urchin Summit Recommendations Follow-up

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BACK TO TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BACK TO TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BACK TO TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 





SEA URCHIN SUMMIT FOLLOW UP PROGRESS AND UPDATE

BACKGROUND

The Sea Urchin Summit was held in Vancouver, B.C. on March 6, 2007. The Summit focused on the challenges and recommendations of the Benchmarked Competitiveness Study of British Columbia Sea Urchins which was commissioned by the British Columbia Seafood Alliance (BCSA) in co-operation with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) for the Seafood Value Chain Roundtable. The purposes of the benchmark study are: securing an enduring competitive advantage for Canada in international markets and gaining a better understanding of the red sea urchin fishery on the Pacific coast of Canada.The Summit was hosted and organized by the Pacific Urchin Harvesters Association (PUHA). There was particular emphasis on the impacts of the Russian illegal, unregulated and unreported (IUU) sea urchin fishery which was identified as the greatest threat to the economic sustainability of Canada’s Pacific sea urchin fisheries. There were 48 participants who included:

  • Regional and National AAFC representatives
  • Regional and National Department of Fisheries and Oceans representatives
  • Representatives from the Province of British Columbia
  • Directors of the PUHA
  • Directors of the BCSA
  • Directors of West Coast Green Urchin Harvesters Association (WCGUHA)
  • Alaska and California sea urchin fisheries representatives
  • Mr. Hashimoto processor and importer from Hokkaido, Japan

SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND FOLLOW UP

  1. INTERIM MANAGEMENT MEASURES: March 15/07, Nanaimo. Attendees: Russell Mylchreest (Regional Invertebrate Resource Manager), Rick Harbo ( Shellfish Program Coordinator), Guy Parker (Shellfish Coordinator), Dan Leus (PUHA Biologist), Pauline Ridings (A Shellfish Coordinator), N.C. C&P representative, Mike Featherstone (PUHA), Tim Joys (PUHA), Ken Ridgway (PUHA), Darren Macy (D&D) Pacific. DFO representatives agreed to put aside the requirements for the N.C. on grounds monitor (OGM) for the mainland fishery for the remainder of the season. PUHA provided a protocol for the management of the fishery including nominating an on grounds coordinator to communicate daily with D&D and assume the OGM role. It was agreed that PUHA would supply the OGM for the QCC fishery and PUHA proposed a reduced fishery with 14 days of OGM coverage. This flexibility allowed the continuance of the mainland fishery and provided cost savings for the industry while maintaining sustainable management measures.
  2. PRESENT SEA URCHIN SUMMIT SUMMARY TO RANDY KAMP: March 22/07, Maple Ridge, B.C. Meet with Randy Kamp, Parliamentary Secretary to Minister of Fisheries to discuss the industry challenges and provide an overview of the Sea Urchin Summit. Request funding for science to address the PUHA budget shortfall.
  3. UPDATED THE SEAFOOD VALUE CHAIN ROUNDTABLE (VCRT) ON SEA URCHIN SUMMIT: March 28/07, Ottawa, Ont. Provided the VCRT with the Summary of the Proceedings of the Summit. Following the meeting met with Robert Day, Chief, International Trade and Coordination, DFO, to discuss the inclusion of sea urchins as one of the APEC case studies on IUU fisheries as part of the Bali plan.. The sea urchin case lends itself well to this study as the sea urchins come live from the harvest grounds to the Japanese landing port, they are weighed and recorded for landing taxes and finally the product goes directly to a local processing facility. The case study will look at the economic, environmental and social aspects of the Russian IUU fishery.
  4. PRESENTED SEA URCHIN SUMMIT RECOMMENDATIONS TO HEATHER JAMES: March 29/07, Ottawa, Ont. Met with Heather James, Chief, Resource Management Operations, Pacific Region to discuss interim funding for science and areas of potential cost savings. The budget shortfall is over $200,000 and $42,500 is required for the PUHA biologist.
  5. MEETING WITH PAUL STEELE REGARDING ELECTRONIC VESSEL MONITORING AND COORDINATING C&P EFFORTS: March 29/07, Ottawa, Ont, Met with Paul Steele, Director General Conservation and Protection Directorate to provide an overview of the EVMS proposal and the option of using the existing Atlantic Region VMS center to monitor and collect the data. Discussed possible coordination with existing C&P efforts to decrease use of the OGM.
  6. PHONE CONFERENCE WITH TERRY GLAVIN REGARDING CONSERVATION GROUP ACTION: April 4/07, Vancouver. Terry will facilitate efforts with both Russian and Japanese conservation groups. He is traveling to Russia in May and will discuss the issue with his contacts at that time. It is possible to raise the awareness in both countries. Follow up meeting in early June once he returns from his travels.
  7. MEETING WITH RANDY KAMP TO REQUEST FULL PARLIMENTARY APPROPRIATION FOR SCIENCE: April 10/07, Maple Ridge. Joined with Ron MacDonald, Executive Director, Canadian Sable Fish Association and representative of the Canadian Fisheries Working Group to discuss current lack of funding and lack of action following the recent court rulings which declared it illegal for the DFO to fund co-management by the use of fish. We requested a full Parlimentary appropriation to cover the funding shortfall which is an estimated $30 million for all fisheries across Canada.
  8. LETTER TO HOUSE OF COMMONS STANDING COMMITTEE ON FISHERIES AND OCEANS: April 16/07 Requested the opportunity to speak to the Committee regarding the issue of funding and the changes to the legal authority of DFO to allow the use of fish allocations to fund science and management. Particularly to request a full Parliamentary appropriation to fund science covered by these changes.
  9. SEA URCHIN SECTORAL MEETING: April 24, Nanaimo, B.C. Raised the issue of the current budget shortfall and the request for full science funding for PUHA given the current economic conditions as a result of the Russian IUU fishery. The industry and DFO need to work together to deliver required science and management programs more cost effectively which could include EVMS, reduced OGM requirements, and alternate methods of data collection. The DFO needs to evaluate the conservation risk management with respect to the red sea urchin fishery as there are exiting tools including harvest size, area rotation, area closures, fishermen’s information and recommendations, as well as the ecosystem considerations which reduce the need for extensive bio-mass surveys. There is a concern that the lack of funding will lead to reduced quotas due to reduced biomass surveys.
  10.  HOUSE OF COMMONS STANDING COMMITTEE: May 3/07, Ottawa Ont. Presented concerns regarding the lack of DFO funding to the PUHA in spite of a long record of supporting co-management with millions of dollars since 1994. DFO has a legal and moral obligation to fund science and management. No funding = no surveys, no updating of information, decrease in confidence = possible decrease in quotas = blackmail
  11. MEETING WITH GOR RUSESKI TO UPDATE CURRENT INTERNATIONAL TRADE ACTIVITIES: May 3, Ottawa Ont. Gor confirmed the inclusion of the Russian Sea Urchin IUU Fishery as one of the APEC high level economic case studies, the study is being commissioned for completion in the spring of 2008. Bi-lateral diplomatic efforts are continuing with respect to catch documentation and certification with Japan and enforcement of TAC’s in Russia. There are informal discussions at the missions to be followed up with formal meetings. Going forward there will be opportunities for Minister to Minister discussions and the efforts should involve American representatives. The Russians will be at the NAFO meetings in September.
  12. DFO RESPONSE TO SCIENCE FUNDING: May 14/07, Vancouver, B.C. DFO undertaking a case by case study of all fisheries to assess priorities for conservation and effective fisheries management. Some extra funds are committed to each region and the regional managers will distribute and allocate.
  13. MEETING WITH TED PERRY AND DON RADFORD REGARDING CURRENT PUHA CHALLENGES: May 14/07, Vancouver, B.C. Recommended at least full funding for the PUHA biologist to maintain consistency across the science programs. Need to re-evaluate the risk associated with current red sea urchin management and science requirements relative to the current economic situation. Red sea urchins would make a good case study/pilot project for eco-system management.
  14. FOLLOW UP LETTERS TO MINISTER OF FISHERIES, DON RADFORD, TED PERRY, GOR RUSESKI: June/07
  15. CORRESPONDENCE WITH REPRESENTATIVES FROM CALIFORNIA AND ALASKA TO ENCOURAGE A COORDINATED US/CANADA RESPONSE TO THE RUSSIAN IUU June/07

BACK TO TOP

 

Copyright 2006 Pacific Urchin Harvesters Association - Site designed and hosted with Priority